In recent years, it has been a common occurrence to secure loan contracts by concluding house sales and purchase contracts. The seller under such house sales and purchase contracts is generally the borrower under the corresponding loan contract or a third party, while the purchaser is generally the lender under the loan contract. Given that such house sales and purchase contracts are of the nature of securing the performance of loan contracts, this paper defines such contracts as "security-type house sales and purchase contracts". As for house sales and purchase contracts, the determination of contract validity is an issue that cannot be ignored, and there are a variety of views on this matter in judicial practice. This paper conducts a preliminary study on the determination of the validity of security-type house sales and purchase contracts with reference to relevant judicial precedents.
After the lessor enters bankruptcy proceedings, whether the right of the bankruptcy administrator to decide to continue performing or terminate the executory contracts specified in Article 18 of the Bankruptcy Law of China shall be restricted is a highly controversial issue in bankruptcy proceedings. Based on his own professional practice and focus on the theories and practices of China's bankruptcy law, the author discusses and exchanges views on the aforesaid issues from the perspective of real estate leasing in this article. Your comments and corrections are sincerely welcomed.
Little A: *My Fair Princess* has been remade! The new version is called *New My Fair Princess*.
I. Introduction
In recent years, the scale of elderly care institutions in China has expanded rapidly, and disputes over services provided by elderly care institutions have also shown a year-on-year growth trend. This is attributable to a variety of factors, including insufficient service experience of elderly care institutions, low competence of nursing staff, the lack of reasonable understanding of elderly care services among the elderly and their family members, as well as the fact that China's elderly care service industry is in a period of rapid development with relevant norms and systems not yet sound. In particular, many operators of newly opened elderly care institutions lack awareness of proactive prevention in handling elderly care service disputes, which leads to their excessive hesitation and failure to make effective decisions in a timely manner when disputes arise. The overall philosophy of the Opinions is to promote the law-based, standardized and orderly handling of disputes over elderly care institution services, and safeguard the lawful rights and interests of both the elderly and elderly care institutions.
